This has been a fantastic discussion so far on the topic of cultural appropriation! It can definitely be a touchy subject and I’m really happy to see everyone being so kind and thoughtful in their responses.
I wanted to give my thoughts on the subject as someone with beliefs that come from a living culture that has historically been through some rough stuff. I’m a Celtic Pagan, specifically focused on Irish practices. This culture is a living culture with practices that have continued from ancient times, though they may have changed form or look a bit different now. Celtic mythology has been bastardized, watered down, and taken out of context for profit for years - that is the common definition of cultural appropriation in a spiritual context.
I am an outsider to that culture. I was born in the US, and even though my ancestors come from Europe, that was hundreds of years ago and I’m pretty removed from the diaspora, too. Because of this, it is not up to me to decide what is respectful use of Irish culture or beliefs - it is up to them. The reason I say this is because of the historical significance of the beliefs and people. If they say that a specific practice can only be done properly if taught by a teacher in that field, then that’s what I take it as. I am not privy to the knowledge of the teacher, so if there is something that can only be taught, it is what it is
That is exactly what Traditional Wicca is, too. Traditional Wicca is a closed practice and I don’t think a lot of people understand that. It is an initiatory religion with mysteries that are only revealed after being taught and initiated.
There isn’t anything inherently wrong with gatekeeping when done properly. It should be there for the person’s protection and not as a way to create exclusivity. For example, I have a child. I am the gatekeeper for my child. I determine what is appropriate for her based on her age and skill level. If she wants to cook a meal, she needs to be able to do it safely. If I don’t feel she is capable of doing it safely or that she doesn’t have the necessary skills to understand what she’s doing, then she can’t cook a meal. The same is said for closed practices and initiatory traditions. It is up to the teachers and keepers of the knowledge to determine what their students or interested practitioners are capable of, what they understand, and how respectful they are. Of course, not everyone does this ethically, but in a perfect world, there would be no bias or prejudice.
Now, of course, information and practices can be shared and that happens all the time! The difference is the respect those practices and information are given. There is also a difference between my learning something from a native (to the culture) practitioner and my learning from someone removed from the culture. A lot can get lost in translation, and someone profiting from teaching things that aren’t part of their culture is unethical at best, in my opinion.
You also mentioned virtue signaling when people are adamant that they don’t use things such as white sage or other appropriative practices. My perspective as a creator is a bit different. Often, when I’m writing a blog post, doing a podcast, or creating a video, I have to mention specifically that I’m not using something from a closed practice. This isn’t virtue signaling or me trying to say that it’s wrong. This is me protecting myself from the hundreds of thousands of people online who will attack creators for cultural appropriation based only on the creator’s appearance.
It’s not my place to tell other people what is and isn’t appropriative because I don’t belong to a culture that has been historically ostracized, demonized, or genocided (as has happened with Native Americans). I do my best for myself personally, but what other practitioners do or don’t do is none of my business.